Help me out here?The bigger problem is that he knows not of what he speaks, yet people will believe him because he is famous and sounds so damn convincing.
Just how is that his problem, or mine? Would a person go to a mechanic to get assistance with delivering a baby? Would a person go to a Doctor to get their car fixed?
No one here is disputing the rest of your post.
The person who will believe some one who is famous (such as an actor) for a medical solution has an all together different problem. And they are in serious trouble. Just which famous person should one believe?
I really have not met many folk like that in my life time, and I have been exposed to some pretty messed up people. What does not make sense to me with that line of thought; is if people were really that gullible, it would not be all that hard for a well known professional (in the field of psychiatry etc) to help a lot of people. After all they would listen to that famous professional. Right?
For example Dr James Dobson who is a Psychologist is very well known, has authored many books, Yet I have some serious problems with some of the things he does and says. Yet he has quite a following. His organization has claimed to have corrected two homosexuals. Yet that appears to be the limit of his success in that area.
My personal experience in that field is that as stated psychiatrists use drugs to help a person, and while Psychologists are extremely good at identifying the problem, they lack what is necessary to help the individual. I think some therapists have better success.
However the point of my post above is even if one was to accept that Tom Cruise is out to lunch here, is that reason enough to attempt to destroy him? By attempting to hang such titles as moron etc on him.
Is there anything wrong with accepting the fact that he is not a perfect human being, but is a good actor, and enjoying his contribution to society? Or should we attempt beat him down to nothing.
I really have a hard time writing (repeating) some of this. Because in the eyes of some of the community in which we live, we are looked upon as being the exact things we are accusing Tom of here. I asked this question in my previous post and ask you again. Is what’s good for the goose good for the gander? If it is then there should be no complaining about our lot in life as cross-dressers. Let’s just keep on kicking each other apart.
There is one thing some cross-dressers (not all) share with the religious bigots who some of us oppose so strongly. They are both out to change others so that they can feel good about themselves. As opposed to attempting to help others for their good.
If one can see that you are attempting to improve their life then you have made a friend, and are then in a position to influence that person. I fail to see how the negative stuff in this thread can benefit me. In fact I feel insulted by the suggestion that I may not have the intelligence to listen to what someone tells me, and if I have no previous knowledge in that area, fail to research it for myself in order to decide what to believe. If in fact it is all that important to me.
Peace,
Darlene.
