Crossdressers-Haven.com

A new wig arrived in the post yesterday and I am so pleased with it. Having said that I would rather use my own hair but it's thinning out by the day.

I have also received a proper pair of black ladies trousers with a side fastening and they fit perfectly. In my own personal opinion trousers with side or a back fastening are much more ladylike. I shall wear them out later. Nobody is going to be any the wiser. It's such a shame nowadays that women no longer wear these trouser styles. Out of curiosity does anyone else here own trousers with aside or back fastening?

I had a couple pairs back in my skinny-ish days. I had a side zip and a back zip. I think I prefer the side zip just for the ease. I do agree about them being more fem. I think that's partly because they tend to be cut better at the crotch or at least the zip assembly doesn't add that extra bulk and so has that smoother line.

It's good you found a nice fit; it can be pretty difficult. It isn't just jeans that are a struggle to get right.

Hey! everyone wants to see the pants with your new hair. Please please?

I've never worn ladies trousers, can't see my legs

At one time I had a pair of Talbot's black pants with Side zip, fully lined. They were very comfortable.
Ronnie

I have a few pairs of trousers, though less than most GGs, including one very nice pair of "mole skin" black ones with a side zip that are something of favorites with me, I have worn them a few times in stealth mode with a black satin blouse for concerts.

I have 3 prs of ladies trousers but they are really quite simple & not elaborately feminine.

Davita wrote:I had a couple pairs back in my skinny-ish days. I had a side zip and a back zip. I think I prefer the side zip just for the ease. I do agree about them being more fem. I think that's partly because they tend to be cut better at the crotch or at least the zip assembly doesn't add that extra bulk and so has that smoother line.

It's good you found a nice fit; it can be pretty difficult. It isn't just jeans that are a struggle to get right.

Hey! everyone wants to see the pants with your new hair. Please please?

I agree that the side zip rather than the back zip is the better option. I shall when I have time take some photos for all to see.

I wore my trousers out today and I found it so liberating to wear an item of women's attire without making things obvious. I remember when I was growing up I had to wear pair of green tartan patterned trousers with a side fastening which I hated wearing at the time. Coming forward several years I have wanted a pair of side zip trousers for so long and this last week was my dream come true. I find them so much more comfortable than jeans or male trousers.

I sometimes wear a pair of my wife's jeans (Old Navy), and while the fit is comfortably tight and lower rise than men's jeans, the zipper is absurdly short. I'm not that well endowed, but pulling it out of those pants to pee might cut the damned thing off.

Side and back zip pants might work for me, but I don't like a very high rise unless they have suspender buttons. Tight belts are uncomfortable. Part of my problem is that I have a white boy's non-existent backside and not enough of a belly to hold things up. Unless they're low rise and relatively tight, they almost slide off my non-existent hips.

Paulette wrote:I sometimes wear a pair of my wife's jeans (Old Navy), and while the fit is comfortably tight and lower rise than men's jeans, the zipper is absurdly short. I'm not that well endowed, but pulling it out of those pants to pee might cut the damned thing off.

Side and back zip pants might work for me, but I don't like a very high rise unless they have suspender buttons. Tight belts are uncomfortable. Part of my problem is that I have a white boy's non-existent backside and not enough of a belly to hold things up. Unless they're low rise and relatively tight, they almost slide off my non-existent hips.

These are the trousers that I have bought. They are high rise waist which is what I personally prefer. The good thing is as you shall see they are a 34 inch inside leg and the beauty is that one can have the leg measurements altered to ones requirements. They are nice and roomy which is just as well because of my middle age spread.

http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/Simon-Jersey- ... 4852810a64" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;


I understand what you mean about the bathroom visits. I don't have that worry as I have to sit because of prostate reasons and of course it is much more ladylike.

When I think back to the days I was made to wear side fastening trousers. I now ask myself did my being made to wear these trousers unwittingly set the precedent for bringing out the woman inside of me and the need to express it?

Paulette

but pulling it out of those pants to pee might cut the damned thing off.

Don't you wish! So sit Honey!