I think it is interesting that all I said was:
Yvonne wrote:
Your story also brings up another good point about going out: how we dress. The 'conventional wisdom' is: dress down, blend in, dress like other women. I tried that...once. I hated it. I know what I like to wear, I know what looks good on me, and I know what makes me *feel* attractive. That's what I wear when I go out. And if I'm not dressed like all the other women around me, well guess who's problem that is.
Yvonne
and the interpretation of what I said comes to this:
Dress your age
Don't dress for sexual reasons
Don't wear 4-5" heels
Dressing like a slut (or being called one)
Womens' Lib is the problem
I feel that Beauty and Deborah, in their replies, made all kinds of assumptions about me and how I look and what motivates me to dress the way I do. On all counts, they were incorrect. I described myself in the most general of terms, speaking of what looks good on me, what makes me *feel* attractive and so on, and the conversation became very sexualized, as if dressing was all about sex.
This may be one of the reasons why women don't like to make themselves look nice anymore. The minute they do, some guy is going to call her a slut and thinks she 'wants it.'
http://www.yvonnesplace.net/partners/cdslut.htm
As for it being a by-product of women's lib, I disagree. Do you expect all men to appear in public always in a suit and tie and a hat? They used to. Personally, I agree with you. I'd like to see people invest a little more time and energy in being presentable when they go out in public. Maybe some of them would behave better (or at least not shout into their cell phones). But I wouldn't hang it on women to fix the problem.
If you have ever watched teen-agers (boys and girls both) experimenting with their 'look' you will see that they are really searching for an identity through their appearance. How much different is that from what a transgendered person is going through? I remember a girl once showing up to school (ninth grade) wearing a wig! She thought it made her look nice. Her feelings got hurt that day, but she got over it too. It was just something she had to do.
Even though Beauty and Deborah are taking opposing points of view, I think they are both right - for themselves. For example, when Beauty says wearing 4" heels to the mall isn't practical, well, it is if the shoes are comfortable and you like wearing them and they look nice with what you are wearing, and it makes you feel nice wearing them and so and so on.
In Kersten's post (which I know is not the post that started this thread) she said that:
"Right off, some people were looking at me. I feel my projection
wasn't good. I kept going. I also wasn't real happy with the longer
skirt and sweater and shoe combination."
I think this hits the nail on the head. The most important thing, in my opinion, wasn't how she was dressed, but how she felt about it. Because how she felt affected how she was perceived. And the perception should be "I'm OK with this and you should be too." In order to reach the point of being able to say "I'm OK with this," a lot of self-acceptance has to take place first.
I 'm not trying to start an argument. I know I tend to take a point of view that is uncoventional, but it troubled me the way the discussion veered into some orthogonal issues, like women's lib or a dress code for crossdressers or how women *should* dress and how it quickly took on sexual overtones.
Regards
Yvonne