A different TG support group meeting.
Posted: Tue Nov 02, 2004 12:44 am
Hi!!
At some point in the past, when Julie M. was indicating her intent to go to a support group meet (which she did, and posted about it), I promised to provide comparative info on another support group when I was able to be in town for a meeting. That was tonight.
This group meets in Oklahoma City, OK, and is sanctioned by a group of therapists and moderated by one of them. There were 11 participants on this night. Five were FtM's, four were MtF, and two were SOs of one or another of the TGs (one woman and one man). It was enlightening to hear some of the problems of the FtMs, some of which sounded familiar, and some of which were unique to their situation. Much of the discussion (since a FtM was the facilitator responsible for bringing up a topic for the evening) actually centered first around a prosthetic device, called a Packer, that simulated the appearance of male organs in the clothes. It seems that possession of one of these devices increases the self confidence of the TG in casual social contact, since they feel that women (and some males looking for rivals) steal glances at the crotches of men's pants, and pass judgement on whether or not to engage them in conversation based on that and casual and surreptitious touches through their clothes. This stimulated a short discussion on this perception; the view was shared by two (1/2) of the MtFs and the only GG (non therapist) in the room. I found it interesting that in general the discussion was dominated then and in other areas by the FtMs, much as you would find in a normal mixed encounter group. The therapist was responsible for trying to keep a balance by shifting around and asking for input from others.
During the break and after the meeting, I also found it interesting that the MtFs gravitated together, and the FtMs joined in on a passionate discussion of the recent football game between two state rivals, and the fall cleanup at their yards and houses and a thorny leakage repair problem (one is a plumber). The MtFs were more interested in discussing choice of surgeons, therapists, costs, and the source of the clothes being worn by the only two dressed MtFs. Sterotypical? (No, no, no, I do not mean the others were nude, just in drab)
All the FtMs presented male, and all but one did a decent job passing, two outstanding. The exception had a large bust, and it was too painful to bind them back. Three related recent incidents were they did not pass, and this did bother them a good deal. None of them care to consider leaving the area for jobs where no-one knows them, believing they should just be accepted for who they try to present, somewhat unrealistic in a couple fo cases.
Among the MtFs, three are planning to relocate two after surgery, and one before and after. One MtF is already very pretty, young, and Asian, with the boyfriend, and has had some alteration while on a trip to Thailand, but still lacks GRS. One other is actually intersexed, and has had recent GRS due to emergency problems with the slightly more dominant male-like sex organs (incomplete testes), and is now approaching the problem after a fait accompli and before the Benjamin standards would cover the situation. She has entered counseling after the surgery to help her adapt rather than the reverse. Socio-economic status ranged from decently well off with a good job, to poor and on economic assistance. Hope this is of some interest to someone.
This group meets in Oklahoma City, OK, and is sanctioned by a group of therapists and moderated by one of them. There were 11 participants on this night. Five were FtM's, four were MtF, and two were SOs of one or another of the TGs (one woman and one man). It was enlightening to hear some of the problems of the FtMs, some of which sounded familiar, and some of which were unique to their situation. Much of the discussion (since a FtM was the facilitator responsible for bringing up a topic for the evening) actually centered first around a prosthetic device, called a Packer, that simulated the appearance of male organs in the clothes. It seems that possession of one of these devices increases the self confidence of the TG in casual social contact, since they feel that women (and some males looking for rivals) steal glances at the crotches of men's pants, and pass judgement on whether or not to engage them in conversation based on that and casual and surreptitious touches through their clothes. This stimulated a short discussion on this perception; the view was shared by two (1/2) of the MtFs and the only GG (non therapist) in the room. I found it interesting that in general the discussion was dominated then and in other areas by the FtMs, much as you would find in a normal mixed encounter group. The therapist was responsible for trying to keep a balance by shifting around and asking for input from others.
During the break and after the meeting, I also found it interesting that the MtFs gravitated together, and the FtMs joined in on a passionate discussion of the recent football game between two state rivals, and the fall cleanup at their yards and houses and a thorny leakage repair problem (one is a plumber). The MtFs were more interested in discussing choice of surgeons, therapists, costs, and the source of the clothes being worn by the only two dressed MtFs. Sterotypical? (No, no, no, I do not mean the others were nude, just in drab)
All the FtMs presented male, and all but one did a decent job passing, two outstanding. The exception had a large bust, and it was too painful to bind them back. Three related recent incidents were they did not pass, and this did bother them a good deal. None of them care to consider leaving the area for jobs where no-one knows them, believing they should just be accepted for who they try to present, somewhat unrealistic in a couple fo cases.
Among the MtFs, three are planning to relocate two after surgery, and one before and after. One MtF is already very pretty, young, and Asian, with the boyfriend, and has had some alteration while on a trip to Thailand, but still lacks GRS. One other is actually intersexed, and has had recent GRS due to emergency problems with the slightly more dominant male-like sex organs (incomplete testes), and is now approaching the problem after a fait accompli and before the Benjamin standards would cover the situation. She has entered counseling after the surgery to help her adapt rather than the reverse. Socio-economic status ranged from decently well off with a good job, to poor and on economic assistance. Hope this is of some interest to someone.