Thank you, Elizabeth. The clothes are a shorthand statement. It saves a lot of time, and the more feminine the clothes, the less energy I have to put into proving anything. The easiest presentation uses dresses of some sort, because that's automatically feminine. It is a little harder to go out in pants, for me, because it's no longer as clear what I'm presenting.So for me the clothes are needed as part of my denial that I am male. Without them, I would have to continually verbalize to everyone that I am not a male, or everyone will expect me to behave as one. While crossdressed, no one expects me to act male. The clothes tell everyone.
Reading your statement, I can understand a little more why it was so hard to bring any so-called "feminine" characteristics to the surface, while I was still being a man. Without the clothing, it can be confusing when a man acts in some way that is clearly feminine. I never wanted to confuse people, so for me, I didn't have very many options as a man. In some ways, it takes more courage to be a "feminine" man than it does to be a full-out version of a woman.
Absaroka wrote:
Now that's a unique way of looking at it, Absaroka. It's amusing, and there's some truth in it.Therefore the crossdresser who dresses as a woman in spite of his wifes discomfort is exerting "male privilege" and not acting "feminine" The feminine thing to do would be to do what the partner wanted and dress like a man.
DeeDee wrote:
A nice situation, Dee. I can see why you'd be happy with that.Do I dress to please her....of course, but I always wore them anyway and she knows I'm Dee in any mode. She does prefer me as a lady, so maybe thats beyond most relationships...but I'm in heaven So, I dress to please her, (and me) and the attention I get from guy types just flatters me.