Thanks to everyone who responded. Because your responses were so thoughtful, I want to acknowledge each of them with a short reply.
Celia.—Although I was contemplating communications that would be strictly over the Internet, your advice certainly is on the mark. For CD’s (or anyone else, for that matter), it is easy to get caught up in situations. If some guy in a nightspot is flirting with someone he thinks is a GG, it probably is best for the CD to say, “Thank you for the compliment, but I’m happily married” (or whatever), and not risk becoming a statistic.
Connie.—You make an excellent point that I had not considered. A service like
Match.com probably has rules and regulations. If it became known that a person had used the service to “test their transgender passableness,” the owners might feel that their service had lost credibility and that their economic interests had been damaged. It would be a rude shock to find oneself the target of a lawsuit.
Jaye.—I agree with you that for a TG who was interested in finding dates, they would have a better chance of finding a compatible partner if they said up-front that they were a TG, so that persons not interested in a TG could screen themselves out. Since my purpose would be to “test my transgender passableness,” I would be defeating my purpose to admit that I was a male crossdresser. But for those who actually want to meet someone (which I do not), I think your point is persuasive.
Beauty.—Thanks for taking a stand. Anyone who thinks you are being overly cautious might consider visiting the
Remembering Our Dead website. It is hard to know exactly how many of those murdered CD’s were killed by men who thought they had to “uphold their honor” after being misled, but certainly that was the situation in many of those tragic cases.
Lizzy B.—Thanks for the compliment! You are right, I think, that it would be very easy to start with a limited plan, but then to follow your curiosity to the next step ... then to the next ... until thing were hopeless out of hand. That probably account for some of the statistics cited on the Remembering Our Dead website. Thank you.
Deborah.—I like your spirit! You are right that “passing” on a website is a rather limited form of passing. Getting out to that movie matinée would be a lot more fun!
Anita.—Your analogy with a business-person calling competitors, acting like a potential customer, so as to find out their prices, is an apt one. You said you did not feel good about engaging in these minor deceptions, even though they were not serious compared with (say) the fraud at Enron. Your point is a good one — we have to live with ourselves.
Josey.—I have gotten e-mail SPAM offering to sell me products that supposedly would allow me to trace electronic information to its source. I know the FBI can trace information sent over the Internet, because they track down the sources of computer viruses and the like. Whether any
Match.com clients would be likely to have those capabilities is anyone’s guess, but the caution you offer is well worth taking into account. Thank you!
And thanks again to everyone! I have decided
not to pursue my “Can I pass?” experiment. It would not be worth the possible problems it might cause.