Exhibitionism

General talk about CD/TGing and gender topics that aren't necessarily fun things we do while en femme, or for gender-driven discussions.

Moderators: KimberlyS, CathyAnn

User avatar
CJ
Miss Diamond Goddess
Posts: 3562
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2003 11:12 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Post by CJ »

Hi all,

Darla,

I agree. Although I'm not quick to judge, I do think his behaviour was "not kosher." Especially because he brought another person--a person apparently willing to let him be himself for a spell (read: SO)--out of her comfort zone (without her knowing beforehand this was going to happen) and into the orbit of his sexual fantasies. And did so publicly, I may add. This is the kind of exhibitionism that often has SO's worried no end. And rightly so, if this is the result.

Darlene,

I'll stand with Beauty on this one. In the long run, I feel it's much more unhealthy to let reality (whatever that is!) cloud our compassion than the other way around. But maybe that's just me. 8)

Love,
CJ
Image
Loretta Ann
Permanently Banned
Posts: 2199
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 11:30 pm
Location: Vancouver, Canada

Post by Loretta Ann »

Hi all,

It is not my place to judge him, but I will judge the actions. It is my place to have compassion for him, but it is not my place to support those kinds of actions. And it is my place to explain what is behind those kinds of actions. (Re. the driving force behind them.) I see reality as being issues that need to be dealt with.

Beauty,

Are you sure that it can be cured with therapy? I have a friend (professionally qualified) who has been twenty two years (directly involved) in the business that claims that such things as pedophilia etc. can not be totally cured. He has seen no evidence to such claims. Those are the situations where compassion really comes into play. (they just like us did not ask to be made that way.) (They like us do not want to be that way.) And believe you me he has worked with many of them. He has in fact worked with all kinds and claims that many Psychologists end their careers disappointed that they have been unable to help very many people.
Last edited by Loretta Ann on Mon Aug 22, 2005 5:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
Marlena Dahlstrom
Miss Emerald Goddess
Posts: 217
Joined: Thu Aug 11, 2005 1:54 am
Location: SF Bay Area

Post by Marlena Dahlstrom »

Well his behavior was certainly self-centered and showed a disregard for others' (i.e. Kathy's) feelings. Taken to an extreme that becomes sociopathic. And like pedophiles, sociopaths are notoriously resistant to psychological treatment. Since they lack empathy, it's really tough to get them to understand the hurt they cause.

In a former career I was a journalist and covered the courts for awhile, where I saw a couple sociopaths. I'm not sure what caused them to be sociopathic, but their conscience was just...missing. Just as if they'd been born without an arm or a leg. Seeing that was truly frightening. Because you knew that if they ever got released, they'd have no reservations about doing similar deeds again.

I doubt Kathy's client was anywhere near that, but I've known a number of people who were so self-centered that it's tough to get them to look beyond themselves. Unfortunately, you can only help them if they're willing to do so.

Darla
Loretta Ann
Permanently Banned
Posts: 2199
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 11:30 pm
Location: Vancouver, Canada

Post by Loretta Ann »

In part Beauty wrote: and from knowing Kathy I trust her judgment not to leave and don't see it as submissive.
Beauty I am curious,

You have stated in another post that you do sometimes step out of your comfort zone. How do you see that?

When ever I step out of mine I see myself as submitting myself to unknown territory. For example when I first ventured into the land of the web, especially cross-dressers forums I was way out of my comfort zone. I submitted to those who were here at that time, went through all the hoops, that were set out in the forum categories, and answered all your questions. In a sense I became some what accountable to all of you that were here at that time.

I see Kathy’s situation in the same way. She submitted to the requests of her client. Once she did that she was then required to be accountable and go into unknown territory with him.

Can you please enlighten me?
Beauty
Retired Site Administrator
Posts: 3662
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 4:30 am
Location: Northern VA
Contact:

Post by Beauty »

Hi Darlene,

I've stepped out of my comfort zone addressing this whole thing. I think if I say anything else I will be repeating myself, but I'll try one last time.

I was also kind of offended by something you said. When someone asks me if I can enlighten them it usually is condescending statement. In a light conversation it's funny, but since you've challenged everything I've said in this discussion since you posted your feelings about this person so strongly, I don't think you're saying it in jest and so that's why I'm kind of shaking in fear as I type this. I'm not an alpha personality (Why are you looking at me like that CJ? :) ). So no Darlene, I don't think I can enlighten anyone and I don't think I can enlighten you if you haven't gotten what I've been saying before. As I stated above I'm out of my comfort zone talking about this so even if I had the ability to I really couldn't now.

Like Darla and CJ (sorry to bring you two into this, I just need support I'm falling over responding. I'm a weakling.) I agreed with about this person his behavior was weird, but I can not base any sound judgement over him based on one outing. I do not equate this person with Hitler or a person who does harm to children. I think he was a person who represses his sexuality and his CD'ing. I feel he used his meeting with with Kathy to do something that was very uncool, but it's what I'd expect from someone who had pent up sexual and mental expression. So yes, I think a person like I just described can cure himself with therapy.

If I'm wrong ok, I goofed. I was just trying to state my opinion. I am unable to defend an opinion based on nothing. It's just my thoughts. I'm not trying to sway anyone or control anyone's thoughts. I just stated how I felt about him. I almost regret it, but I stepped out of my comfort zone and said something. I'm proud of myself for that, but I think I've said enough now and I've stepped further out of my comfort zone that I wanted too, much further in fact.

If you don't mind I'd really like to stop talking about this after this post. I'm getting overly defensive and I think it's ugly of me to do in a conversation. If I haven't added clarity to what I've said previously I don't think I can do any better.

I'm still glad I said what I said though. It's liberating to say something even if you think you're going to be challenged for saying it. Yeah, I kind of felt saying something completely opposite of what you said would mean you'd challenge my thoughts Darlene, but I decided that was uncool of me to think that and so I just typed my feelings about the matter. Maybe you thought the same thing and so I apologize if I pulled you out of your comfort zone by sounding as if I was challenging you. I wasn't I just wanted to say my peace and be out of it.

I can now relate even more with Susann and Robin. I still think they should stand behind what they are saying because there's no crime against saying how you feel.

I've felt uncomfy speaking for Kathy since my first post. So I'll let her answer that question you asked me in your last post.

:: breaks in to song.. singing "Kumbaya" :: :)

Beauty
Loretta Ann
Permanently Banned
Posts: 2199
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 11:30 pm
Location: Vancouver, Canada

Post by Loretta Ann »

Beauty,

Thank you for explaining that you were out of your comfort zone. I did not realize you were. I respect you as a person and because of that I was just attempting to get your understanding. I am sorry you viewed it as a challenge and feel offended I did not intend for that to happen. I thought I was asking for clarification, and no; I did not see what you wrote as a challenge. (not coming from you) I had hoped I might learn something from you.

I appreciate your thoughts and thanks for being honest and open here. I now understand you better than I did. You can stop shaking because I love you, and wish you no harm. Take care of yourself honey.
((G))
PS Just so that you understand me better I expect my views to be challenged and I am not afraid of that. I respect those who do that as long as it is done civilly.
User avatar
CJ
Miss Diamond Goddess
Posts: 3562
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2003 11:12 pm
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Post by CJ »

Hi all,

Beauty,

I'm here. 8) I'll be honest; I'm sort of outside my comfort zone as well, speaking about this subject, because I'm not a qualified professional either. I just go by what I see and what I've learned (as do any of us). My thinking is that Darlene has a good point; no one asks to be the way they are. They just are. On the other hand, the difficulty is that this can be used to justify anything from the inability to sleep at night without a teddy bear to the most horrifying sociopathic behaviour. (By the way, all, let's make one thing clear: there's a universe of difference between what Kathy's customer did and what pedophiles and sociopaths do and, frankly, it irks me to see them continuously mentioned in the same breath--we need to stop doing that, right now. [-X )

Although I'm not so sure that a "cure" is available (or even desirable) for people whose sexuality is, let's say, "different" (especially if that sexuality harms no one), it might just be the case that their being more honest and up front about who they are (and what turns their crank) could lead them to enjoy slightly smoother interpersonal relationships. For example, in this case, Kathy would no doubt have appreciated being told that what she was about to experience as a result of who this customer is would be taking her out of her comfort zone. Did she come to harm as a result of all this? I don't know the answer to any of these questions; like you said, Beauty, it'll be up to Kathy to let us know, if she so chooses.

Darlene,

A difficult thing about judging even the actions of others is that we always tend to do so by our own standards and with only a partial knowledge of what's going on. Have we any choice, really? Well, yes, I think we do. We can make an effort (if we're so inclined) to try to see what a person's life and experience can look like to them, from the inside, so to speak. This does not mean "approval." Nor does it even mean "support," of all things. It just means we make an effort (because, yes, sometimes it is an effort) to withhold judgment at least long enough to get a clearer picture of how people themselves see and understand themselves. Again, like Beauty said, there's just not enough information available in this case with Kathy's customer to know the real score (assuming the real score is ever knowable when it comes to anybody but ourselves).

Something I try to be very aware of when dealing with my own clients is the extent to which I'm "pushing" a person in a direction that conforms more to my own wishes than to theirs. This is unhelpful (and quite possibly harmful) to them, to me, and to the link we have (if its therapeutic nature is to be maintained). Sometimes, all you can do is to hold someone's hand as they crash and burn--very often as a result of unfortunate choices they make. But, at least, they're their choices, not mine nor anybody else's. People tend to re-examine their lives much more willingly when someone stands by them and doesn't desert them (even in the face of their folly) than when they're pushed, guided, or manipulated into being someone they're not.

Kathy's customer did nothing wrong, other than to put her in a position she's not comfortable with. This is half his doing and half hers (her own well of strength and compassion is such that she chose to stay; who knows? maybe she even appreciated having had the opportunity to learn something about herself on that day. Again, only she can say.)

Beauty,

Please, please, don't ever hesitate to post how you feel or what you think about things just because people bring issues of experience and competency to bear. That you think people can become better persons, that there's always a road ahead for them, speaks volumes about what's in your heart, regardless of whether or not you're "professionally qualified" to make such statements. That, to me, is a breath of fresh air and I wouldn't have it--I wouldn't have you--any other way. Having said this, I'll respect your decision to no longer participate in this thread if you really don't want to. But I have to say, your doing so will deprive us of your own sorely needed brand of wisdom. :(

Love,
CJ
Image
Beauty
Retired Site Administrator
Posts: 3662
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2003 4:30 am
Location: Northern VA
Contact:

Post by Beauty »

Darlene wrote:Beauty,

Thank you for explaining that you were out of your comfort zone. I did not realize you were. I respect you as a person and because of that I was just attempting to get your understanding. I am sorry you viewed it as a challenge and feel offended I did not intend for that to happen. I thought I was asking for clarification, and no; I did not see what you wrote as a challenge. (not coming from you) I had hoped I might learn something from you.

I appreciate your thoughts and thanks for being honest and open here. I now understand you better than I did. You can stop shaking because I love you, and wish you no harm. Take care of yourself honey.
((G))
PS Just so that you understand me better I expect my views to be challenged and I am not afraid of that. I respect those who do that as long as it is done civilly.
Awwwww Darlene... you had me at "thank you.. you had me at thank you" :)

Thank you sooo much Darlene. I understand better too.
(--):heart: (--)

Beauty
Elizabeth
Miss Ruby Goddess
Posts: 1878
Joined: Mon May 03, 2004 3:02 am

Post by Elizabeth »

Hi girls,

I think Kathy, like all of us perhaps, was in an uncomfortable position while making money. I have many times been way out of my comfort zone, for the love of money, or more appropriately, the need of money. When we sell our services, to whoever, we always have the option of quitting. So it is not as if Kathy was forced into this situation. She could have stopped it, or admonishied her client at any time. It was her choice to continue.
Darlene wrote: If he has any self esteem it has to be a very sick one IMO.
Although perhaps unknowingly (I see) Kathy as being the submissive one. The gentleman I don’t think was being very gentle. On the contrary; quite rude, gross, etc. IMO.
That sounds like things I have heard said about me and crossdressing. I have been told that crossdressing is a sick perversion, and that going out in public like that is rude, gross, sickening and just wrong.

I guess it all depends on where you draw the line. When I am out in public in my state of unpassable dress, I am sure there are people who are saying how sick I am. How I should get help. How rude it is of me to make my kids or even the public are large so uncomfortable with my rude, sickening, perverted behavior.

I take the "who am I to judge others" attitude about this kind of thing. Control is more of a perception than a reality. When I go out, I am not controlled by the public at large. I feel I am the one doing what I want, not being controlled by the masses opinion of crossdressing. If I make someone uncomfortable because I refuse to accept unwritten social rules, by dressing as a woman, does that make me in control?

I think we are talking about highly subjective behaviors, where we all set our own behavior as the standard by which all others are judged. For those like Kathy who are willing to leave their own comfort zone to acknowledge that her standard may not be "the" standard, are opening themselves up to understanding.

I mean after all, we as crossdressers take most people out of thier comfort zone, just being who we are. Does that make us "sick" or "perverted" or "disgusting", all things I have been called? I think not.

Very interesting thread.

Love always,
Elizabeth
Loretta Ann
Permanently Banned
Posts: 2199
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 11:30 pm
Location: Vancouver, Canada

Post by Loretta Ann »

CJ,

Thank you for your thoughts. You have not written anything (Specifically directed to me) that I have not previously thought about. I will not get into defending myself here. Other than to repeat that my style; has more to do with asking questions and letting people go where they will as opposed to pushing them in any direction.

I simply don’t believe in it, and like wise I do not entertain anyone attempting to push or control me. Like I said in a previous post I have what is called a quiet will of iron.

I am sorry that you were irked, but I don’t see that as being one of my problems. It does not bother me in the least.
Loretta Ann
Permanently Banned
Posts: 2199
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 11:30 pm
Location: Vancouver, Canada

Post by Loretta Ann »

Where I draw the line is in intentionally doing it to freak people out so that they will humiliate you. I can not support those actions. I view that quite differently from your situation Elizabeth. The line is very clear for me. But everyone is different.

That is just the way I am, I see that as intentionally, willfully hurting others mentally. And I just can not get my head around that. Perhaps others can and that is alright with me if they can.
Susann_Gardener
Miss Emerald Goddess
Posts: 107
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2004 7:47 am
Location: Boston area

Post by Susann_Gardener »

Darlene wrote:
Susann_Gardener wrote:
Darlene wrote: Well Susann,

Can you explain to me how one that lives by themselves and dresses (only) at home is an exhibitionist? Help me out here hon? What reference do you have for that kind of statement?
Darlene
I think this adds to the complexity of exhibitionism.
This was in reference to taking pictures of ones self. If we have pictures, we show them. Sometimes (as I think you are saying) we only show them to our selves. Does this fall into the subject category? I think it does, but in a different (maybe its just "safe") way.
Susann
Ok Then Susann include no pictures of ones self also. which many of us don't have. I won't even show a picture of myself in my avatar. Me thinks there might be another kind of complexity occurring here.
Ok, Darlene, From the description there is NO exhibitinism.
Susann_Gardener
Miss Emerald Goddess
Posts: 107
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2004 7:47 am
Location: Boston area

Post by Susann_Gardener »

Since I started this, I thought I would include an update.
Having been told I was wearing "large" breasts, I thought I would experiment with some old foam falsies I have. I put them in a proper bra, put on my hiking shirt and backpack. I looked ridiculous. Two lemons on a board. They were just too small for my size. So, my thought of wearing these when I’m on more traveled trails is out.
User avatar
Virginia
Goddess of the Universe
Posts: 5543
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 4:06 pm
Location: Strange Magic Hill

Post by Virginia »

If I may???!! First, as I see this thread, if you take it to its very basic principle! If you have male genitalia and put on what society deems to be attire attributed to the female of our species - what are you?? for lack of a better term, you are "a guy in a dress." Then the complexities arise do they not? The multitude of ?whys? beg for an answer! Thus the multitude of psychologist and psychiatrist who venture into "our" arena and God bless 'em for doing so! The DSM, Dr. Vitale's exploration, Carl Jung and on and on. Some one(s) is attempting to understand "the guy in the dress." To piegon hole us as it were, but they and we are finding out that each of us is different, not only physically, but mentally. We are as complex as it may get within the human race. Are we a third sex? We know that there are those of our "sisters" who only want to dress, the whys and wherefores be damned, it is just fun and, the time in and amount of, clothing vary widely. Then there are those who (like me) are (my words) blessed with "The Gift" to hopefully develop certain feminine emotional characteristics, i.e., caring, love, empathy, the so called "touch-feely" side.
A lot of us read a lot about "us." There are evidently enough of us "out there" to warrant more and more attention for the "scientific community." In fact it is becoming more and more evident that a lot of the scientific community is blessed with this opportunity to "express there feminine side" and not only do they find it pleasing, but they relish the thought of finding out why the desire exists in "us" and "them" if you will.
Granted, even our "community" casts dispursions on others of our sisters who do not meet the guidelines that we in our own community set as acceptable standards of conduct - even beyond what "society" places on us. (as per Kathy's foray into a "darker side" of us.). We are being studied, dissected, put back together in various forms, labled, piegoned holded and thrown against the wall to see what sticks. It is not going to happen overnight, but with every post we learn a bit more and that is the beauty of us! Proverbs (again) "Wisdom is the principle thing therefore get wisdom, BUT with all thy getting, get understanding!"
As I have said before and will continue to say, "Thank God for this Forum and my sisters here!" You have and continue to aid this "girl" in her struggles, her defeats and her victories. So I will continue to contribute and share what I can (from my experiences) and you know my matra: just love your own "Magical Mystery Tour."
I love you all!!!!
Virginia
First star to the right, then straight on 'till mornin!
Bobby
Miss Silver Goddess
Posts: 45
Joined: Thu May 23, 2013 11:08 pm
Location: Oregon

Re: Exhibitionism

Post by Bobby »

going back to the earlier discussion: i would like to look 'atractive". to me women in their late teens early twentys are the best looking. could i ever look that young, not with bags under my eyes and losse floppy skin on my arms. someday i'd like to "pass" as a 40 or 50 year old 'libraian', just blend in and be 'off' anyones radar. i like taking pictures of my legs and feet because i think they look good and its oneway for me to see that. i need to lose weight before i'll look descent in a dress. why take pictures of yourself on vacation? because you're having a good time and want to 'store' the memory.
Post Reply