Elizabeth wrote:
I have to be honest and tell you that I don't see your visit with your mother in law, your joy at her acceptance of you, and your subsequent anguish at her eventual rejection, to be either a part of emperical research or a practice for your acting. Please accept my apologies if I am wrong about this, but your actions, including taking and sending piotures for approval, are in my opinion, classic crossdresser behavior. I can't help but wonder if Rod has come up with the perfect disguise, reason, and motivation to present as female. Again, if I am wrong about this I apologize, but I do hear the pain in your post, I recognize it.
As far as the pictures are concerned, my wife's mother and aunt were the ones who originally suggested taking them at the restaurant. This was fine with me, as I had brought my digital camera in my purse. The next day, my mother-in-law told me on the telephone that she was looking forward to seeing the pictures, so I mailed them the day after that. I suspect that she was disturbed because the pictures looked a bit
too convincing. All she could see was Maggie, and she could not recognize me underneath.
I personally wouldn't mind being classified as a transvestite, so I don't take any offence at your suggestion. I wouldn't feel any shame or guilt in it. If fact, my wife already considers me to be a cross-dresser. In view of the fact that I get a lot of emotional satisfaction portraying a woman, I suppose I
could be regarded as a CD/TV, depending on how you define the terms.
However, based on what I have learned from TG meetings, TG websites, and other research, there are several reasons why I think that I am not a typical CD/TV and that I might better be described as an actor who does female impersonation.
1. I am not interested in wearing female clothes for their own sake. For example, unlike most CDers, I
never wear women's panties - even when I am in drag. Nor do I find any pleasure in simply being a man in a dress. I only dress to be in costume for the Maggie character.
2. Most CDers have an overwhelming desire to cross-dress, without regard to their ability to "pass" or how good they look as women. In contrast, my motivation to portray Maggie arose from my unexpected discovery of how realistically I was able to look and act as a woman. My satisfaction comes from demonstrating my skill at female impersonation. If I wasn't able to do it well, I wouldn't continue.
3. Unlike many CDers, I don't feel any gender dysphoria. Although I have found pleasure in discovering and expressing my "feminine side," I am basically happy being a man and wouldn't want to be female.
4. I think I am a natural-born actor. I enjoy the freedom that acting gives me to express many different emotions and aspects of my personality. I have found pleasure and satisfaction in many of the male roles I have played, and I have enjoyed the praise I have received for my acting ability. I will admit, however, that I have found the greatest challenge and satisfaction in the two female roles I have had thus far.
5. When I am not in character as "Maggie," I do not feel that she is "me." When I admire her pictures, I feel that I am a man looking at a woman who is a separate and discrete individual.
6. I don't find much point in dressing at home alone, and only do so when I am rehearsing before my video camera or taking photographs to study my appearance. My goal is to perform and/or test my female impersonation skills in public.
7. Presenting myself as a female-impersonating actor (as distinguished from a CD/TV) allows me to be open about cross-dressing, since it is in a context that other people will find more comfortable and understandable. I can let people know that I am proud of my acting and FI skills, and that I don't regard cross-dressing as any kind of stigma.
If you think my arguments are simply rationalizations for cross-dressing, that's okay with me. Like I said, I don't mind being regarded as a CD/TV. You can label me however you wish. I am what I am.